How Not to be a Pavlovian Lab Rat

This is my final weighted blog of the science of education module. I have collaborated the ideas of the previous weeks and synthesised my own model of education based on them.

Barky: Science of Education

 

Whether it was Pavlov’s dog, Thorndyke’s cat or Skinner’s rat (Miltenberger, 2004), behaviourism can be a governing principle.  Differing reinforcers including grades or social reinforcers such as the spelling bee do shape our learning behaviour, while drill and practise are the academic representation of stimulus reward pairing (Skinner, 1953).

Such learning does have a place in education. Tournaki (2003) demonstrated students using rote compared with principled strategies to learn addition. The rote learning predicted an increase in post test and transferable task scores, but the principled strategy predicted the highest scores in the heretofore mentioned variables. This is also in line with Willingham’s (2006) research describing how the foundational semantic knowledge is a springboard to skills such as critical thinking, or more automated processing of intellectual functions.

The damning factor of the behavioural paradigm is determinism. It says you are the product of your environment; it is entirely systematic…

View original post 529 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s