Do Conspiracy Theories Constitute a Psychopathic Disorder?

They’re a topic that have received relatively little attention throughout the advancement of psychological research. Yet conspiracy theories have a large impact on our involvement with society. We may only turn a tolerant scientific smile to those who tell us that 9/11 was plotted by the US government, but what about theories that our politicians are trying to engineer the decline of different systems to achieve their hidden motives? Such topics often grab our attention far more powerfully, and not always for bad reasons.

Early work by Hofstadter (1971) argued that conspiracy theories developed from people feeling incapable of bringing about change through social or political action. Because of this, some researchers even suggest that producing conspiracy theories is symptomatic of psycho-pathological behavior (Swami and Coles, 2010). Much of the current research does suggest that the underlying cause of conspiracy theory circulation is related to negative aspects of peoples lives.

The sharing of conspiracy theories have been found to change opinions, arouse anger and cause people to become more apathetic within the political system (Butler et al, 1995). It has been suggested that they are used as a means of justifying outraged and distressed emotions (Festinger, 1957), or that they manipulate emotions to further their message (Sunstein and Vermeuhle, 2009) and that their use often causes people to take a biased view towards evidence (McHoskey, 1995). All these sources, as cited by Swami and Coles (2010) present research that implies the promulgation of conspiracy theories is abnormal behavior.

But I don’t think that’s fair. As I said above, we may think it a bit odd, that people are making claims like that princess Diana was killed on purpose. But what about on a smaller scale? What if I say that university tuition fee’s have been raised to attack the poor? Or that the capacity of the A65 has been reduced, thus increasing traffic so as to justify gaining funding to build a rail connection to the local airport. Am I spreading an emotion fuelled message without solid evidence because I feel unable to make my voice heard through the proper systems? Yes, I am.

Look at how I changed the wording though. Swami and Coles used the word “incapacity”, while I just used the word “unable”. That is because I don’t believe that I am not physically capable of raising my opinion, I just feel like it isn’t listened to. And that’s what Clark (2002) argues, that they demand greater transparency from government behavior. In some ways, they are a force to unite people in campaigning for much needed changes (Sasson, 1995).  This is exemplified by evidence that has come forward in recent years surrounding attempts by the US government to provoke war with Cuba in 1962 (Swami and Coles, 2010, see also Ruppe, 2001)

While certain conspiracy theories can be highly unethical, such as those that discriminate against different races or socio-economic class, the manor of pathologising a behavior that we all exhibit in some form makes me skeptical. The research carried out on this topic is largely subjective, with no common construct upon which to determine if this behavior is healthy or not. We may choose to frown upon certain theories, while embracing others, yet the above evidence suggests this freedom of thought creates an open channel for democratic action, allowing us to put to use our powers of reason that separate us from all other species.


Ruppe, D. (2001). U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba. ABC News, Retrieved from

Other references as cited by:

Swami, V. & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there. The Psychologist, 23(7), 560-563.



2 thoughts on “Do Conspiracy Theories Constitute a Psychopathic Disorder?

  1. An evocative blog that explores the different possibilities for generation of conspiracy theories extremely well. The blog sets out the argument at the start clearly and the response is well structured and supported with evidence. However a weakness of the blog is that it fails to deliver insight into the methods used by the researchers in obtaining their findings. The conclusion of the blog makes only the briefest mention of the subjective nature of the evidence. Therefore the blog would benefit from further elaboration of the methods of investigation.

  2. I don’t believe that people who believe conspiracy theories are displaying psycho-pathological behaviours, I mean, it’s natural for you to dis-trust this person or that person, and that’s normal. What is it about not trusting those in higher positions which suddenly makes it a symptom of psycho-pathological behaviour?
    I don’t trust someone in my flat because when milk was dissapearing it turned out to be them stealing it. So now when milk vanishes I turn to them first, does that mean I’m displaying psycho-pathological behaviour or do I simply accept they have done it in the past and so they might do it again?
    A similar story can be seen in America, the mentioned attempt to provoke a war with cuba is relatively well known in some areas and the knowledge of that means some Americans still believe that the government might have done something similar since or might plan something similar in future.

    Although I think some people appear to pull them out of thin air, or take the theories to silly extremes, I don’t believe that it’s a sign of something unless it is to the extremes, I just see it as a sign of distrust.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s